An Analysis of Policy Solutions to Mitigate the Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Public Awareness and Participation

Authors

  • Mak Chanmony Faculty of Law and Social Science, Banteay Meanchey Campus, Cambodia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v1i2.236

Keywords:

Greenhouse, Public Awareness, Gas Emissions

Abstract

This research analyzes policy solutions aimed at mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing public awareness and participation in climate action. By examining diverse policy interventions, such as renewable energy incentives, carbon pricing mechanisms, energy efficiency standards, afforestation, reforestation, and sustainable agricultural practices, the study evaluates their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, equity, flexibility, and political feasibility. The analysis draws on both primary data from interviews with policymakers, environmental advocates, and community leaders, and secondary data from literature reviews. The findings reveal that renewable energy incentives and carbon pricing mechanisms are among the most effective strategies for reducing emissions, although their feasibility varies due to financial, political, and social factors. Public education and community-based approaches emerge as the most successful methods for increasing public awareness and fostering participation, especially when tailored to local contexts and combined with digital platforms to reach wider audiences. However, gaps in current policy frameworks remain, including insufficient integration of international cooperation, underrepresentation of marginalized communities, and limited focus on behavioral change and engagement strategies. This study highlights the importance of adopting a combination of policy measures that leverage the strengths of each intervention while addressing their limitations. It calls for more inclusive and integrated approaches that align local, national, and global policies, actively involve underrepresented communities, and promote behavioral changes through targeted interventions. By identifying these gaps and opportunities, the research provides actionable recommendations for policymakers, stakeholders, and civil society organizations to create more comprehensive, equitable, and effective climate strategies.

References

Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2018). Renewables: The Politics of a Global Energy Transition. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262038134.001.0001

Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2019). The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon: Theory and Experience. Journal of Environment and Development, 28(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496517758375

Ali, K. A., Ahmad, M. I., & Yusup, Y. (2020). Issues, impacts, and mitigations of carbon dioxide emissions in the building sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12187427

Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Rajamani, L. (2021). International Climate Change Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789338.001.0001

Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2019). Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(4), e568. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.568

Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Huang, G., Guizzardi, D., Koffi, E., & Janssens-Maenhout, G. (2019). High-resolution temporal profiles in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. Scientific Data, 7(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0462-2

Devine-Wright, P. (2020). Community versus local energy in a context of climate emergency. Nature Energy, 5(3), 170-172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0554-9

Haider, L. J., Hentati-Sundberg, J., Giusti, M., Goodness, J., Hamann, M., Masterson, V. A., Meacham, M., Merrie, A., Ospina, D., Schill, C., & Sinare, H. (2019). The undisciplinary journey: Early-career perspectives in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 947-962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00671-7

Haites, E. (2018). Carbon Taxes and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Systems: What Have We Learned? Climate Policy, 18(8), 955-966. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1492897

Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Forster, J., & Haug, C. (2015). Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683658

Khan, M. A., Uddin, M. N., & Haque, M. S. (2021). Digital Divide in Bangladesh: Rethinking Strategies to Narrow the Gaps. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2020-0140

Manzo, K., & Padfield, R. (2016). ICT and Climate Change: The Role of the Internet and Social Media. Geoforum, 70, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.03.004

Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., ... & Zhou, B. (2021). IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896

Middlemiss, L., & Parrish, B. D. (2020). Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy, 61, 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.010

Moser, S. C. (2016). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.366

O'Neill, S. J., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2021). "Fear Won't Do It": Promoting Positive Engagement with Climate Change through Visual and Iconic Representations. Science Communication, 31(1), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009347206

Obergassel, W., Arens, C., Hermwille, L., Kreibich, N., Ott, H. E., & Wang-Helmreich, H. (2021). Governance and Climate Change Mitigation: The Role of Institutional Change and Policy Instrument Interaction. Earthscan from Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173021

Pihl, H., Holtsmark, B., & Stordal, F. (2021). Emission pricing and the role of international cooperation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 105, 102391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102391

Roberts, J. T., Muttitt, G., Pye, S., Lazarus, M., & Erickson, P. (2021). Assessing the Carbon Emissions Pathways and the Relevance of Policy Scenarios. Environmental Research Letters, 16(1), 014009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abcda9

Sabato, S., Corti, F., & Vanhercke, B. (2020). Integrating the European Pillar of Social Rights into the European Semester: Roadmap for strengthening social Europe. European Trade Union Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3745877

Sovacool, B. K., Griffiths, S., Kim, J., & Bazilian, M. (2020). Climate change and energy security: a research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617

United Nations. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/6d15ec47-en

van der Gaast, W., Begg, K., & Flamos, A. (2021). Designing governance frameworks for climate action: Policy instruments and social acceptance. Climate Policy, 21(5), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1884821

van der Ven, H., Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2020). Valuing the Paris Agreement: Climate Change as a Normative Power. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 20(3), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09479-x

Downloads

Published

2021-07-15

How to Cite

Chanmony, M. (2021). An Analysis of Policy Solutions to Mitigate the Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Public Awareness and Participation. Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 1(2), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v1i2.236